About Author

Journalist, writer, lobbyist, columnist, strategist and consultant. There are uncountable ways to address me. Learn more.

Feed on

Posts to be added soon

Shaukat Tareen - An excellent choice for Finance Advisor --- Reflections on the global credit crisis --- Parliamentary joint session briefing - Impact --- The Way ahead.

Translator

PPP - Rule at this cost?


The role of Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) in the restoration of democracy throughout history has simply been heroic. It has sacrificed its leaders. It has often accepted humiliating terms in order to ensure transition to democracy and it has only too often forgiven its arch enemies. Yet there is no gainsaying that it has never emerged unharmed out of these episodes. There might be many in our learned class who care two hoots about the future of the PPP for now the establishment’s figurehead, an ex-army chief and reigning president of the country, has fashioned himself as the champion of liberal thought. But there are uncountable among us who seriously worry about Pakistan’s only democratic force. The PPP has shown more than once that it is the only serious force advocating unadulterated democracy.
While it is grossly unjust to misjudge a government’s performance based on mere three months especially when we apparently had no problem in tolerating a nine year dictatorial regime, but the government should also not misjudge or misconstrue the situation. We cannot deny that there is terrible agony in the air. The people of Pakistan are in pain and the popular anger wishes to find as many people to blame as is possible. Then the fact that the establishment of the country has never quite accepted the PPP as a positive reality of life does not help even a bit. Indeed even before the return of Mohtarma Bhutto to Pakistan a media spin had already started. Whenever she gave an interview in the Western press hinting an important policy stance, she was quoted out of context here. Yet when she arrived here, the grand reception she had really made the establishment go berserk. Her life was cut short and those who had always hated the house of Murtaza Bhutto all of a sudden became its well-wishers in the party succession issue. The purpose was clear. Whosoever has seen Ghinwa Bhutto behaving politically of late knows that her leadership could only promise the destruction of the PPP.
Then as Asif Zardari took over the party charge, another defamation campaign began against him. Only this time quite conscientious intellectuals and journalists were also sucked in the campaign. The reason was simple. When Benazir’s last government was dismissed in 1996, the general mood owing to the establishment’s machinations and the party’s own follies had become only too critical. Nobody knew then that the corruption cases against Zardari and other party influentials will remain in the courts for a decade and even then fail to as much as indict anyone. Some leading lights of the media did not mind narrating the establishment’s version in the press without any problem. All these folks now felt threatened when they realised that Zardari could become the next PM. All of a sudden Amin Fahim became a martyr in their eyes and they felt affection for Nawaz Sharif too.
This betrayal of the intellectual class results in an unmitigated disaster. The new kingmaker was made so much insecure from the very start that his consultation process was reduced to a couple of unelected advisors. Since then while the PML-N has already vanquished the PPP in Punjab using the judicial and other crises as excuse, the PPP seems still struggling at the federal level. I say struggling because the party seems virtually clueless on the political matters. We have proven ourselves to be fickle minded already. It does not matter to us what your sacrifices are if you fail to ameliorate our lot quickly. We do not seem to care that it was during Nawaz Sharif’s rule when the Supreme Court of Pakistan was physically assaulted. We now consider him a champion of the judicial cause because he is paying the issue considerable lip service. He incidentally has become an advocate of media freedom also despite having broken all the hitherto records of media manhandling. In order to judge his pro-liberty credentials you should however wait for the day when he becomes the prime minister for you have already made him quite strong. Perhaps then you will know.
As for the PPP government I can only this: I know it is not incompetent. It actually has the best human resource available in my opinion. However to survive and make a difference in such testing times you need heroic will power. The PPP seems unwilling to work for the change which it had promised or was expected of bringing. As long as the presidency has Musharraf and the power to dissolve the Assembly the party rule will not be viewed benignly. As long as the judicial issue remains unsettled it will father further unrest. And in Pakistan it is very difficult for the people to digest the fact that the prime minister takes guidance from the party leadership for except for the case of the PML(Q) the party leaders have usually served as the premiers of the country too.
In my view the party cannot be blamed for the crises that the country is suffering. However as a voter, a taxpayer and a believer in the cause of the PPP it is my right to ask why is it allowing itself to be hurt so badly. Before the rule Zardari had repeatedly said that his party will not accept rule without real power. However, the party seems to have done just that. Today the democratic government seems only a sequel of the previous government. The cabinet seems to be signing on the dotted line and the prime minister only helpless. The arrogance of leaders like Rehman Malik and Farooq Naek’s continuous belief that popular perceptions can be hoodwinked do not improve the situation even a bit.
The federal government has now already presented and passed a budget that was actually tailored by the PML-N. The N-League has quite skilfully managed to shift this blame too on the federal government. We see action in Punjab and a confusing state of suspended animation elsewhere, particularly in Islamabad. Price hike and the unscheduled power outages have made life a living hell. It seems that either Islamabad will have to kill its own people or else the US will invade us. There is no coherent goal of governance in sight. If the people had given their mandate for the sake of roti, kapra aur makan and not justice then at least they should have been arranged for. But we are nowhere nearer even that target. And the fact that the public perception has worsened this much already will not let the old wounds heal. There is only one way in my view. A decisive course of action. The party chairman should drop those advisors who have become a liability, takeover the reigns of power directly and take decisive action to bring real change. If this cannot be done, and the party is ready to worry about its long term future then the prime minister should come on television, inform the people that the presidency and the establishment are not letting the new government work up to the people’s expectations and the democratic government has no option but to resign. This is the only way to win back support. Whatever deal was between the party, the establishment and the US administration is no more relevant owing to Benazir’s murder. The party is only too crucial for the future of the country to waste.

Miles and Stones - Pitafi.Com surpasses 2.6 Million hits per month mark


I know for a professional website it is not but for a humble blog of a Pakistani journalist this is not less. I am copying below some of recent stats produced by Webalizer software. Please note this count doesn’t include Pitafi Forums or My Review blog which are still trapped in their infacy. Thank you very much readers for your love and support.
Total Hits 2634201
Total Files 132872
Total Pages 2550627
Total Visits 187503
Total KBytes 17171987
Total Unique Sites 4229
Total Unique URLs 16910
Total Unique Referrers 1473
Total Unique User Agents 689
Avg
Max
Hits per Hour
3658
37981
Hits per Day
87806
553967
Files per Day
4429
9739
Pages per Day
85020
552201
Visits per Day
6250
44347
KBytes per Day
572400
2306733
Monthly Statistics for June 2008 (Pitafi.Com)

Will the real PM raise hand? (Part I)



Things keep running in circles in the Islamic Republic. Actually the more they change the more they remain the same. And the irony of circumstances is not lost on us. The country has a new democratically elected Prime Minister. But the question arises is Mr Yousuf Raza Gilani really in charge? All the clues we have had point to a negative answer. Why is that exactly?
Well because the vestiges of the old order both inside the country and outside refuse to go. If you have noted initials of President Pervez Musharraf’s name are also PM. So he is the PM that sits in the Presidency. And the presidency continues to play a retrogressive role even today. People may ask how that is possible? The answer is because the People’s Party’s government at the center seems to be surviving today under a deal similar to the days when Benazir Bhutto had become Prime Minister after the demise of General Zia. You had rule but no real power. While in those days the establishment was only learning to play politics and hence had done hardly any proper homework this time it has.
Last time the dissent against the military rule was led by the People’s Party. The PPP it is an open secret has origins in Sindh and not in Punjab. Since our fat establishment is stuffed with the Punjabi class, it had never actually learned to trust a non-Punjabi group. The then ISI’s head Lt Gen (retd) Hamid Gul has repeatedly conceded this point in his concessions for which he should have faced court martial proceedings.
The result was that the Party while not getting the real charge (I am sure you remember who was the Foreign Minister then? Sahibzada Yaqub or some PPP office bearer?) it managed to stay in power for a while without actually losing touch with its popular base.
That luxury alas is not present for this regime. For one Benazir Bhutto is no more and the party has no bloodline factor visible right now. For two the establishment has played its cards well by stationing the PML-N just behind the PPP at such a safe distance that it can consolidate its hold on power at least in Punjab without having to face the embarrassing situation of the PPP. Just consider this. After having assaulted the previous government’s fiscal and monetary policies when Senator Ishaq Dar becomes the Finance Minister and visits the US his statements indicate that the same onerous financial measures will be maintained. Not only that. He tailors a budget keeping that value in mind and then using the excuse of the judicial crisis he manages to quit the ministry. In this way the PML-N with the close support of the establishment not only manages to set the direction but also to free itself of any responsibility for the tough measures. Do you not find any example in our history that resembles this case? Well in 1946 Liaquat Ali Khan was made the Finance Minister of the Undivided India. He with the help of the Quaid’s secretary presented a budget which really rocked the moorings of the Hindu middle class of the country. This is said to be an additional factor in the creation Pakistan. While in this case the purpose might not have been to further divide the country, it seriously delivers a blow to the People’s Party which already seems to be struggling for the political survival.
Unfortunately the PPP is still refusing to accept that it is losing support especially in the urban centers and particularly the Punjab. Today the Prime Minister is in Multan and I got the chance not only to submit my question but also to mutter personal comments while shaking hands. (To be continued)

Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan - World’s 5th Public Intellectual


Barrister Aitzaz Ahsen has been recognized by the Foreign Policy Journal as the world’s fifth best public intellectual. Here is the link: The World’s Top 20 Public Intellectuals. Read it yourself.
There has surely been criticism too especially because the journal claims that top ten of the world intellectuals are Muslims. Yet on my part I have never doubted Barrister Aitzaz’s intellectual stature. Congratulations sir! We all are proud of you, as a leader and as a personal friend.

Here is his introduction by the journal:
President of Pakistan’s Supreme Court Bar Association, Ahsan has been a vocal opponent of President Pervez Musharraf’s rule. When Musharraf dismissed the head of the Supreme Court in March 2007, it was Ahsan who led the legal challenge to reinstate the chief justice and rallied thousands of lawyers who took to the streets in protest. He was arrested several times during the period of emergency rule last year. Today, he is a senior member of the Pakistan Peoples Party, formerly led by Benazir Bhutto, and one of the country’s most recognizable politicians.

Why all this doom and misery? (Sunday column)


It so happens that I am totally fed up with De Bono’s six thinking hats. After all, you have to pay dearly if you wear a hat in the scorching heat of summers here. But my problem does not end here. I mean it is quite often that in any corporate office or wherever you work you are asked to change your thinking hat for the sake of lateral thinking. These hats or ‘head socks’ as I am obliged to call them are colour coded. White is for facts and figures, red is for intuition, opinion and emotions, yellow for appreciation, black for criticism, green for creativity and blue for the holistic picture. But a hat often ignored by our master of self-help is the one which bosses usually wear – the hat of arrogance. ‘I know better’ is the constant mantra in such situations. Having worked with some of the politest and most principled centred team players I have seen how often a boss has to remove this hat and listen to his subordinates to make things work. But that was one hat missed. There are others. One that we Pakistanis quite often wear on our heads like a permanently stuck wig is the hat of Moaning Myrtle. I am evidently referring to a character from JK Rowling’s magnum opus who having being killed a painful death and turned into a ghost always takes pleasure in wailing out loud and always being in a sombre mood.

There is no gainsaying that the times are tough. I know that the capital is on the flight, that the changes once promised are not coming by quickly, that the country has to sink even deeper to emerge out of this cesspool. And the fact that everyone from the Persians to the Yanks and Afghans many want Pakistan either colonised or fractured is not going to help either. But remember we are good at surviving if survival you can call it. If you take a peek into our history our very survival, very existence, this national life seem nothing short of a big adventure. But if life is an adventure death was an awfully big adventure for Peter Pan. If we do not fear death or national demise what is it that is bothering us?

I know that we are a vulnerable nation. We are fully aware what chance can do to us. It is not very farfetched to think that just anyone can move in a bid to colonise us. Within our frontiers we are bickering and fighting among ourselves and two seriously blood stained operations already seem never ending. Money is getting cheaper and the daily household stuff very expensive. If only I start narrating my own troubles with my own worldview I assure you, you will get a nervous stomach. But despite all this folks, I must remind you that we badly need some patience and empathy. Is it not enough that we all are alive? Alive in this extreme weather. Should we not be thankful that the younger ones among us are keen to make some difference?

Like we need strategies for life we need some graceful ways to accept loss, defeat and if the moment comes death. In this context graceful defiance is perhaps the only way left. I for one hence liked Sarmad Khurram when he refused to accept the prize and walk out on the US Ambassador to Pakistan Anne W. Patterson. I know many would like to see it as a harsh slap in the face. But I do not. This is the most civilised way of registering your displeasure. There is a reason why the dynamics of a walk out are different from a real slap. Some of our friends in order to enhance their stature in the Western eye forget about that. Still others of the overzealous stock misconstrue that such instead of walking out the young chap should have started a boxing match or worse refused to go back to Harvard.

When I make this subtle difference I am certainly referring to the recently held long march by the lawyers. I was in Multan when I saw the crowds coming together. It was not a pretty sight. The marchers were less in number when they left Multan. But as they marched to Islamabad and the number was snowballed another fear gripped me. What will happen if such numbers just paralyse the state’s functioning? Yet I need not have worried. The show was very well organised. When some benighted ones from among the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) and the Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) tried to assault the parliament, the veterans from within the lawyers’ movement stepped out to control them. I was much impressed particularly by the conduct of Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan, Justice (retired) Tariq Mehmood and the deposed Chief Justice.

It was clear from that day on that whatever the lawyers want they do not want anarchy. And that the Chief Justice is not keen to get politicised even though the problem of his restoration has become political in nature. Lawyers from the PTI and the JI were later to attack the integrity of Aitzaz Ahsan and Justice Mehmood. It was plain that they were intolerant of any semblance of moderation. The reasons are evident. Both these parties boycotted the elections and since they missed out in an otherwise windfall of representation they want to send the parliament packing so that they can garner further support. The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) is already being subjected to a subtle character assassination and propaganda. Once the parliament is no more and the PML-N refuses to form another Islami Jamhoori Ittehad (IJI) the same machinations will be applied to it too.

If I am saddened it is not because of the troubles this poor nation is facing right now. It is purely because of the utter hypocritical nature of the opportunism of these folks. And above all what really breaks my heart is that liberal men like Imran Khan and Achakzai are also allowing the discredited zealots to use their names to sabotage a system which eventually would bring hope to them too. But despite that I have reasons to be in high spirits and live with optimism. Not all hope is lost. Where is my hat of hope, that you see often with a magician? Wait and see!

Pakistani establishment, the threat and answer to Mr Haq


I usually do not drag the comments of my readers to the new posts. However there was a comment on my previous post If November comes by a fellow blogger which necessitated longer answer. When I wrote it I thought that it should be shared with the general audience too because I have tried to do away with many misconceptions regarding Pak-US relationship, Pakistani establishment and other such contextual problems. Those who need to understand the context should use the above hyperlink to peruse my original post. The original comment of the reader I am reproducing here nevertheless.

Riaz Haq wrote on June 20, 2008 at 7:30 pm:

Wow!
What a warning!
Please define “establishment” in the context of Pakistan as you use it in this piece. Is it just the military and the “agencies”? Or does it include the narrow elite (including PML, PPP, Feudal zamindars, the bureaucracy, the judiciary, the military, etc.) who have ruled Pakistan since its inception? Do you think any members of this elite have ever been held accountable to the people for their misrule and corruption? Do you think the “establishment” in US is in any way comparable to the Pakistani “establishment”?
If there is “annexation” with Afghanistan (which makes no sense to me), are the beneficiaries going to be any different? How would the US benefit by annexing Pakistan? Or would it just be a merger of the tribals with the feudals to serve the interests of both rather th the US? How would the middle class (the backbone of any democracy) fare under this or any other possible arrangement?

My Response:

Thank you very much Mr Haq,
I don’t know whether this wow from you is a routine jeer from you that I often receive or true appreciation. However from your later statement “which makes no sense to me”, I deduce that it is pretty much routine.
I think in the second line of the article I have given most precise definition of establishment as is possible. Do yourself some good and read the definition again in any of the internet dictionaries or encyclopedia.
Tell me who do you think is conservative in this country and who not? If you consider the People’s Party, perhaps the only progressive political force in the country which does it on its own accord and not out of sycophancy for any dictators, conservative then our conversation is already over. However if you do not then I have problems with your observation regarding the establishment. You certainly are viewing everything with an erroneous elitist model.
Tell me have you heard or read about Milbus? Have you been through Dr Ayesha Siddiqua Agha’s tome Military Inc.? I know what conservatives would say but I really respect that work. If you have you should do so again to know that the civil military and judicial bureaucracy comprise the most powerful element of the Pakistani establishment. But I do not deny that the political elements, the land owning class or the entrepreneurs do not have anything to do with it. They sure do. But since the first element has more control over the state resources that the latter can only work as a vessel in order to preserve selfish interests. How many years in power have politicians actually been successful in setting the agenda of the state, no matter in power or not? Who has ruled this country in most of the years? Who were Ghulam Muhammad, Chaudhry Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Ali Bogra, Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan, Zia-ul-Haq, Ishaq Khan, Moeen Qureshi, Pervez Musharraf and Shaukat Aziz? Do you get my point? Yet I do not discount your views absolutely. My concern is that the People’s Party has never been a conservative force of the country and never part of the establishment.
As for the invasion of annexation of Pakistan I daresay you are not using your imagination. I gather that you have just been offended by my criticism of Musharraf and hence not bothered to see reason in any argument. Sir, I can also say tally ho on most of points you are making in your weird blog which always takes the wrong direction in argument. But I do not. I know that since my views are principle centered rather than whims or personality cult centered people will get what they need from mine.
Pakistan is endowed with quite a few gifts including its geopolitics. From Gwadar to Wakhan corridor and our presence in such an important theater to our rock structure and nuclear prowess, while most of what we have got may not be of use to us but it is to many others. No matter what we say about collective security the world right now is operating on the good old balance of power. While we may not have it in us (evident from your case), there are many who view us a threat. Hence Balkanization or annexation of the country is quite a convincing option. Whether such elements can succeed in doing so or not is besides the point. My only concern is that it can weaken two good countries, which could have played quite benign role, further. If truth be told Pakistan is the most loyal ally of the US after Israel as time has proved time and again. But that doesn’t qualify us for the mercy of the neocons who do not see the world through anything but an insecurity paradigm. You seem to think that the elite other than the establishment would benefit from such an annexation in Pakistan. The problem again is with your judgment. The elite will be replaced with higher and distant elites or suzerains and owing to the zero sum game our political elite is only bound to lose not gain anything.
And let me also settle an old point here. Apparently in another post you wasted your breath in apparently suggesting that the existing US basis in Pakistan are normal while an international inquiry into Benazir’s murder is wrong. I don’t know what kind of self serving and blind notion is that? Either you are stupid or downright hypocrite to suggest that. If there are US bases in Europe that is because in World Wars the US has fought their battles and preserved them from their fellow Europeans from whom many still feel threatened. Whom has the US fought for us? Nobody. It is us that have repeatedly sacrificed ourselves. Again in the Western Europe and the US there is no historical or pronounced mistrust. It is a relevant concern in our case though. The US studies have never indicated that they desire or plan to seize the European nuclear asset in case of any eventuality. There are countless US research/thought papers from prestigious think tanks which recommend that their administration should do just that.
Meanwhile there is no harm in investigating Benazir’s assassination through any international organization. What harm can it do? We all pay lip service to the IGOs like the UN. We all say that collective security is the only way. Then why not seek help of someone who cannot influenced at least by any Pakistani. Kindly think and read again before speaking. Otherwise I am weary of your hollow rants.

If November comes (the promised column on the US invasion of Pakistan)



A war is being fought at the heart of every establishment of the world. Traditionally the establishment is the force of inertia and conservatism in any group or society. Yet the rise of neo-conservatives everywhere during the outgoing decade has taught many a lesson. Osama bin Laden, the US neo-cons and the Fox News phenomenon have all shown us to which extent blood-thirst and selfishness can lead some groups to demolish everything precious and humane. I name Osama and Bush’s clique in the same breath because if you see carefully they are two sides of the same coin. All we know is that thanks to al Qaeda and the neo-cons the world has lost trust in the multilateral concepts of collective security. The so-called war on terror was perhaps the crudest attempt at engineering a false clash that would have ruined the human race for generations. The attempt seems to have failed and now the neo-con cabal seems to be passing silently into history. Or is it really?

It is true that Dick Cheney, perhaps understanding his unpopularity and bad health, never showed interest in entering into the presidential race. This decision ensured that his neo-con friends would never get a serious chance of regaining power at the centre. But that is not where the real damage has been done. The radicalisation of politics is not a great issue for in a democracy that is always reversible. The actual threat of such deformation is usually to the state institutions which in nature are already quite hostile namely the bureaucracy and the armed forces. I am sure when the American armed forces have produced men like FDR, Colin Powell and Senator McCain there should be some lofty tradition in place yet soldiers the world over usually are taught to be supremacist both in profession and in nationalism. And that is not all. When you have Fox in media and neo-cons in power it is easy to open up to more radicalisation. It is Pavlovian really. When every kind of commendation and promotion for eight years is possible through reiterating the neo-con values it really takes quite a while to undo the damage. Two examples are already in front of us. One of the Indian establishment under the BJP and the Pakistani establishment under Musharraf.

Those who look at the Congress rule in India cannot understand the paradigm shift that has taken place already owing to the BJP rule. Bureaucracy during those days was stuffed with saffron clad bonkers who further radicalised the establishment. How can we forget that in uncountable public gatherings cow’s urine was served instead of water? Even after Congress rose to power the space it has lost to the extremists like Narendra Modi seems impossible to reclaim even though it has to pose radical contestants.

Likewise in Pakistan, the establishment under Musharraf lost all self-esteem and became almost a vessel of the US belligerence. When we pointed that Pakistan should calculate each and every concession made to the Yanks based on the national interest we were reminded that Washington was our paymaster. The slant we had to endure was almost obnoxious. The same retired army officers who are ready to gouge our eyes for advocating some patience towards Musharraf, used to skin us alive whenever we suggested that the army was enduring huge losses owing to its prolonged stay in politics. Unfortunately today when it is proven the same folks are over the top without paying any heed to what we say. The damage done to our establishment during the last military rule may not pose any serious threat to any of our neighbours but it has ensured a permanent risk to democracy in the country. For almost nine years now supporting Musharraf could take you to any coveted post. That ensured that quite a few servicemen inhaled the official propaganda of their chief being the promised Messiah and then regurgitated it whenever they got a chance. Now apparently the state of things have changed a bit and these men have stopped chanting pro-Musharraf slogans but almost a decade of service is quite a long time and the middle tier of the officers corps has to live with the same biases for its entire service life. The facts that the circumstances are daunting and that the democratic government is being pressured not to make fast paced changes are not helping even a bit.

We then cannot be too hopeful about the change in the US establishment. Those endowed with wisdom who have seen the peril without any spin are already fighting the establishments the world over. Again the fact that except for a lunatic fringe no one is averse to Senator Obama’s election to the coveted throne purely on racial basis shows that there might be some hopeful sparks in the air already. Obama’s own talk is also very impressive and promises hope and change. But I am afraid that whosoever is brought to power in November will have to endure almost an instant propaganda that the People’s Party had to face in Pakistan or the Congress in India. While we can tolerate the neo-cons, the BJP and in our case a dictator for almost a decade we are not ready to give the true standard bearers of democracy, moderation and humanity any chance to survive. Senator Obama my prayers are with you but you need to be please just as good as you seem for otherwise the future of the species hangs truly in balance.

As for the neo-cons I have this to say. It is wrong to consider them a group of psychopathic Dr Strangeloves. They are not mental. They are opportunistic and mean. I don’t know whether this contagious political disease of taking things to the very brink for personal gains has spread from India during the BJP rule or has evolved from Enron. Yet I have no problem in believing that all this global reign of terror is not merely for psychological issues alone. They are the prophets of crony capitalism. They want the world to be restructured so that the business on whose board they sit next may not have any problem in rising to the top. Their purpose of entering Iraq, Afghanistan and quite soon it seems Pakistan is not to crush some rising radical cult but to restructure the entire resource rich region. If you view carefully Osama bin Laden is equally an ambassador of the Saudi BinLadin Group as are Bush and company the standard bearers of the crony capitalism. If you can trust my drift it is Pakistan which should fear a likely invasion from the US in the coming days rather than Iran. They have not forgotten that a poor country like Pakistan equipped with the nukes and a professional standing army can really become a mid range power once it succeeds in establishing trade and strategic ties with the Central Asian Republics. This is where Musharraf and Karzai figure in. Musharraf during his rule paid considerable lip service to the idea but always vetoed anything practical that could give Pakistan some alternative breathing space. Karzai’s presence in Kabul has ensured that the Taliban insurgency never dies down and Pak-Afghan border is never peaceful. While I do not see how Pakistan, an almost slavish US ally, could pose any serious threat to the US had it succeeded in establishing strategic ties with the CARS, I am deeply concerned that the US establishment cannot see the most probable fallout of its blind policies in the coming days. The fear now is that the two band brothers across this border are now ready to stage a drama in the coming days which will lead to the annexation of Pakistan even before November. Before November because it will be far easier for the new administration to tolerate another foreign colony because then it becomes a management problem and not imperialistic. If not removed as soon as possible or his powers truly curtailed our man can prove to be another Gorbachev. You have already been warned.
(Courtesy The Post)

Pakistan under threat of invasion? - Read my column in a day


You definitely need to know. Accept it or not Pakistan is the next target of the US invasion. It is already clear from the US assault and the blabbering old fool Karzai. While Karzai and another man nearer to us might soon be thrown out like dead rats, before they go they have to fulfill some crucial tasks. For more detail you’ll have to wait another 24 hours to read my column If November comes. So stay tuned. (THE COLUMN NOW AVAILABLE: CLICK HERE)

Sparks in the long march


When they started off from Multan it was not a pleasant site. The participants of the Long March were not many in numbers. Scorching heat, fear of a terror attack and uncountable other such factors must have worked to stop as many from participating as was possible. But it was a dismal sight. Where were all those elements of the society who had vowed to stand with lawyers for the restoration of judiciary? No one had any clue.
Seeing off the marching lawyers in Multan I had thought that just like the previous travels of the supporters of the deposed Chief Justice this caravan would take quite a while to reach Islamabad. But that was only an incorrect perception. Before long the marchers were meeting in front of the parliament and the Supreme Court. And unlike Multan they were in great numbers. Now an old fear was returning to me. Could it be the end of times for Pakistan? Could these people paralyze the entire system? Could this be the start of the civil war? The mood in the air at least indicated that it was. As people started chanting slogan I could smell the bloodthirst. Continue reading Sparks in the long march

Pressuring Geo Network again? - Don’t even think about it


The presidency just seems to have had another attack of madness. We are told that the administration in Dubai has asked the Geo Network to either shut its transmission or then to close down two of its best selling programs Capital Talk and Merey Mutabiq again. Since the presenter of the latter program Dr Shahid Masood has already been nominated for the Chairmanship of the state owned Pakistan Television by the democratic government it is clear that it does not have a hand in it. It is the presidency which now has the problem with the PTV as well for not showing enough of Mervez Pusharraf. It is plain then that an embattled president is now showing his colors again. Continue reading Pressuring Geo Network again? - Don’t even think about it

Page 7 of 35« First...«56789»...Last »