Comments for Farrukh Khan Pitafi's Official Website

Comment on PPP - Rule at this cost? by R Khan

R Khan — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:23:27 +0000

I sort of agree with ‘onepakistani’ , how can you put your loyalty to a party at the cost of the nation. If you totally subscribe to a party that means you are partisan. Why not just evaluate party upon the decisions and policies.

Comment on PPP - Rule at this cost? by Farrukh

Farrukh — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:38:40 +0000

No Mr OnePakistani from Toronto,
You came to my site in support of your own worldview. Anyone who knows me personally is well aware that I am not partisan. Yet I have long believed that the PPP is the best hope for this country and I still believe so. Is that a crime?
However I want to point out a subtle difference between the PPP and the MQM which you seem to support. While hardly any of the PPP leadership was ever indicted in a court of law on corruption, the MQM leadership was indeed indicted. There was concrete evidence available at that time and the witnesses who might have been killed since then. It is the MQM which has butchered innocent people. I was in Karachi on May 12, 2007 and have vivide recollection of that sad day. Please do not try to justify MQM by giving the PPP’s example for there is no simple comparison. On one side is a line of leaders who come back to the country despite all odds and die and on the other is Don Altaf Hussain who has accepted foreign nationality to save his skin.

Comment on How to fight the War on Terror by Shahzada Sher Saddozai

Shahzada Sher Saddozai — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:00:31 +0000

However the big deul might be the Masonic Government, a kind of trimurti with no wheel defined beneath them. No americans really want to defend Masonicism now that MAN is available and born man . Also that as good one murti fell with a broken chest and another has lost both its legs on high streat the thirs wasnt presentable at all,no proletarian stuff passes notice of a prosperous nation . however i liked Change written on Obamas flight to Afganistan.

Comment on How to fight the War on Terror by Shahzada Sher Saddozai

Shahzada Sher Saddozai — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:56:50 +0000

Well the horizen is visible lol! that is the last line of defence your grouped in.
But let me tell you CIA is only a information agency for The US President .
Every politician has had debacle with CIA only when one doesnt know his job .But they charge for helping .And quite spiritual it is when Air Marshal Asghar Khans roof has to fly off in a storm in Florida. Or Sher Baz Mazari’s som remains a weakling graduate because they are blamed for having taken help. The Us President is a pretty smartened genre with ‘What ya got for collateral ,i mean somekind of bank gaurantee? ya asking yer government to behave honorable here? It was such fastness that Nawabzada Nasarullah as Chsairmanb of Kashmir Commitee did’nt meet Clinton but had a picture taken against the pink/organge ivy od Capitol Hil at Pakistan Ambassadors Residence.
Now one more thing because you are a Baluch if im not very wrong you know CIA like a local city’s Information Bureau ,in Multan the Baburs are the real IB ,you can get best information unless one weakens and gets passed hand to hand and lot of scavangers reach to make out from the information . However that CIA IB belongs to every president.But since were going to work together i can introduce you to my observation of a IR this is kind of MOKAY KAY GUA ,and CIA could have an IR on every issue and every presidential family.
However

Comment on Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan - World’s 5th Public Intellectual by Sher Saddozai

Sher Saddozai — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:27:55 +0000

I bet they all cannot tell between Republic and Democracy.
The constitutional lawyers are modern criminals .
And publics everywhere are getting deeper into official corruption and crimes,that the states cover /distract public attention by going to war. [Resorting to Violence]

I like to indulge in a debate but you can tell the harvardians dravidians ,have to reach thier cousins engagement ceremony, or just would like to rephrase.
The topic of the debate should be ‘Written Constitutions are a Crime” .

And the best proof Furrukh is to read the 2003 Lahore High Court Bar Ass., White Paper The Pakistani Judiciary published . I replied: http://www.shahzadasher5.blogspot.com. I think i should update the blogpage with more……..

Comment on Who should be the Prime Minister of Pakistan? by Sher Saddozai

Sher Saddozai — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:23:57 +0000

What we need s a Chief Executive ,the person who wll represent our Executive to John Hall the World Bank Country Manage. Historically we all must know a ‘contry manager’ he used to be a Englishman living in a Riasat or Kingdom and brought nice goodies we call ‘country products[ country in early 1900s meant England. Now John wakes up our telephone and has one meeting due with Prime Minister and then goes bluttering with Chief Secy is there one in ISL. Bluttering means when we are guessing what we are taling to carry on the conversation because we have specified ends .
Bt John wants to introduce her visitors ,the sad part of the tale in non conversant politicians that slept in disbelief as the world went through change and IT revolutions and Environmental Industrialisation amd so much more…………………………………..Today in the integrated world we need leaders and we have in the age of CEO Gen Musharaff A Bureacratic General a FA Pass for a CEO……………………………………………

Comment on PPP - Rule at this cost? by OnePakistani

OnePakistani — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 13:22:33 +0000

Farrukh,

I came to your blog looking for some good reading regarding Pakistan, but all I found was rants from a blind PPP worker.

To me, no party is perfect and every one has their shortcomings. But I find it ironic that people who blame others for their misdeed but ignore and balantly deny the existence of their own-misdeeds.

Asif Zardari may not have been indicted for his crime and the cases were considered in the judiciary for 10 years, but does that mean he didn’t commit those crimes?

Lets assume your theory to be correct, then according to the same logic, Altaf Hussain or Imran Farooq of MQM didn’t commit any crime either, because no court has proved them to be of guilty of any crime.

Same goes for the murderer of innocent people in Hyderabad, Dr Qadir Magsee. Since the courts were not able to indict him, then he remains an angel.

For your information if you live in a distant place away from reality, Benazir Bhutto, who you call Shaheed was responsible for the murder of hundreds of innoncent people of Karachi and Hyderabad. Have you ever heard of Pakka Qila Operation? When BB Govt released criminals from jails in order to have enough people to shoot at innocent people of Pakka Qila Hyderabad…. No these would all sound consipracy theories to you, because your judgement power has been deluded by the blind love of Benazir Bhutto.

And sir, for your Miles and Stones you may have received 2.6 Million hits but is that what you seek? I am one of those 2.6 million hits to you, but be assured I’m not going to come back to your site. I am not blinded by love of PPP or PML or MQM.

Comment on Why Was Zulfi Bhutto Hanged? by Sher Saddozai

Sher Saddozai — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:46:43 +0000

[you can clean these posts after reading if you like,its like a open book.what tony used to call 'pornography! ], i have no problem Furrukh showing a reality aspect of affairs. The state of knowledge or knowledge of state of truth is the key to superiority in a dialogue . There are so many countrties all0over the world where recreational drugs were blocked because you should know that in 1947 dehli was the richest capital in the world and had spending money in europe like Saudi Princes .But Saudi Princes will take a little time perhaps to become authoratative and lordlike over european merchantry and license over gentry. With the German waterloo Western Europe was completely destroyed the cities had to built back. Built back on others expense. around the mid eighteen hundreds all the south africans and british companies had created ‘Mr Gandhi’ and seculariam.A Gandhi’s farm that the world would be and they would impose the mahajin and recognise our chilren and tear open the curtains in name of power of state and dictatorship of masses. Mr bhutto was a card behind Zia Ul Haque.This is where the constitutional chess game begins. While all this time a Paris Zionist forum had been created the Jew has filled every bank and now wanted a exchequere for himself. And one day he would tell the color of everyones money. all this time these things were indirectly discussed in the briar fox’s yard!. Briar fix had a habit of deporting its coward siblings to Canada and ugly ones to Australia.

Comment on Will the real PM raise hand? (Part I) by Google Groups newsletter 13

Google Groups newsletter 13 — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:37:36 +0000

Google Groups newsletter 13…

31, Google Groups newsletter 13 and Google…

Comment on Why Was Zulfi Bhutto Hanged? by Sher Saddozai

Sher Saddozai — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:28:25 +0000

you cannot do in a country what happened through the 1973 constitution. mr bhutto in his life as foriegn minister was also declared son of fm ayub khan .i have seldom thought of a politician prepared by himself to mark a feat for his country . many crimes we see around us cannot be explained easily because there is a thin line in evil genius and madness.who will believe you. bhutto was used as a actor/stooge by a international conspiracy that came out from the 73 constitution he had shopped from italy [drug running ,prostitution,gun running gambling]france [soft porn dictation]and turkey[ zionism and press controls].italy because he and pahalvi were going to control opium and hashish ‘drug running’ money laundering by banning it and making a regime inside the uno. there was no need to fight drugs before 1973 .but when one object in a kliedescope is moved the entire landscape changes. bhutto was not a westernised person but purchaseed westernisation from cia etc. the cia has established a city bank today that has been exgesised from union bank of switzerland that oriuginally banked for the traders that divided after the sino anglais wars. the motif is so big i wouldnt like to waste my energy here.bhutto was removed from becoming a small intellectual landlord god father in larkana and control the speed wagons of regional excise officers like mr tanvir of multan was ppp patriots mpa ,the money was so big that zia ul haque recklessly hanged him and set out to trail the drug money and after he faiuled they imported dr heroine of italy’s drug called heroine and fazal haque and all put up factories and so on the hashish and opium trucks all got spotted but zia ul haque was not a statesman who would sustain the grand motif and gave into cia which started the cia wars..today those wars are on allover around the tribal areas..

the stories of regimes treasons and dougla-pun are very long .we are happy that we are living in a chance for change.