<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Farrukh Khan Pitafi's Official Website &#187; 2008 &#187; June</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pitafi.com/2008/06/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pitafi.com</link>
	<description>Weblog featuring high-quality editorial commentary, research and analysis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 12:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Will the real PM raise hand? (Part I)</title>
		<link>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/30/will-the-real-pm-raise-hand-part-i/</link>
		<comments>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/30/will-the-real-pm-raise-hand-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 15:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitafi.com/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Things keep running in circles in the Islamic Republic. Actually the more they change the more they remain the same. And the irony of circumstances is not lost on us. The country has a new democratically elected Prime Minister. But the question arises is Mr Yousuf Raza Gilani really in charge? All the clues we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-438" title="pmvspm" src="http://pitafi.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pmvspm.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="289" /><br />
Things keep running in circles in the Islamic Republic. Actually the more they change the more they remain the same. And the irony of circumstances is not lost on us. The country has a new democratically elected Prime Minister. But the question arises is Mr Yousuf Raza Gilani really in charge? All the clues we have had point to a negative answer. Why is that exactly?<br />
Well because the vestiges of the old order both inside the country and outside refuse to go. If you have noted initials of President Pervez Musharraf&#8217;s name are also PM. So he is the PM that sits in the Presidency. And the presidency continues to play a retrogressive role even today. People may ask how that is possible? The answer is because the People&#8217;s Party&#8217;s government at the center seems to be surviving today under a deal similar to the days when Benazir Bhutto had become Prime Minister after the demise of General Zia. You had rule but no real power. While in those days the establishment was only learning to play politics and hence had done hardly any proper homework this time it has.<br />
Last time the dissent against the military rule was led by the People&#8217;s Party. The PPP it is an open secret has origins in Sindh and not in Punjab. Since our fat establishment is stuffed with the Punjabi class, it had never actually learned to trust a non-Punjabi group. The then ISI&#8217;s head Lt Gen (retd) Hamid Gul has repeatedly conceded this point in his concessions for which he should have faced court martial proceedings.<br />
The result was that the Party while not getting the real charge (I am sure you remember who was the Foreign Minister then? Sahibzada Yaqub or some PPP office bearer?) it managed to stay in power for a while without actually losing touch with its popular base.<br />
That luxury alas is not present for this regime. For one Benazir Bhutto is no more and the party has no bloodline factor visible right now. For two the establishment has played its cards well by stationing the PML-N just behind the PPP at such a safe distance that it can consolidate its hold on power at least in Punjab without having to face the embarrassing situation of the PPP. Just consider this. After having assaulted the previous government&#8217;s fiscal and monetary policies when Senator Ishaq Dar becomes the Finance Minister and visits the US his statements indicate that the same onerous financial measures will be maintained. Not only that. He tailors a budget keeping that value in mind and then using the excuse of the judicial crisis he manages to quit the ministry. In this way the PML-N with the close support of the establishment not only manages to set the direction but also to free itself of any responsibility for the tough measures. Do you not find any example in our history that resembles this case? Well in 1946 Liaquat Ali Khan was made the Finance Minister of the Undivided India. He with the help of the Quaid&#8217;s secretary presented a budget which really rocked the moorings of the Hindu middle class of the country. This is said to be an additional factor in the creation Pakistan. While in this case the purpose might not have been to further divide the country, it seriously delivers a blow to the People&#8217;s Party which already seems to be struggling for the political survival.<br />
Unfortunately the PPP is still refusing to accept that it is losing support especially in the urban centers and particularly the Punjab. Today the Prime Minister is in Multan and I got the chance not only to submit my question but also to mutter personal comments while shaking hands. (To be continued)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/30/will-the-real-pm-raise-hand-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan - World&#8217;s 5th Public Intellectual</title>
		<link>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/25/barrister-aitzaz-ahsan-worlds-5th-public-intellectual/</link>
		<comments>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/25/barrister-aitzaz-ahsan-worlds-5th-public-intellectual/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 14:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Favorites]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitafi.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Barrister Aitzaz Ahsen has been recognized by the Foreign Policy Journal as the world&#8217;s fifth best public intellectual. Here is the link: The World’s Top 20 Public Intellectuals. Read it yourself.
There has surely been criticism too especially because the journal claims that top ten of the world intellectuals are Muslims. Yet on my part I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-435" title="aitzazahsan" src="http://pitafi.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/aitzazahsan.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="172" /></p>
<p>Barrister Aitzaz Ahsen has been recognized by the Foreign Policy Journal as the world&#8217;s fifth best public intellectual. Here is the link: <a href="http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=4349" target="_blank"><strong>The World’s Top 20 Public Intellectuals</strong>.</a> Read it yourself.<br />
There has surely been criticism too especially because the journal claims that top ten of the world intellectuals are Muslims. Yet on my part I have never doubted Barrister Aitzaz&#8217;s intellectual stature. Congratulations sir! We all are proud of you, as a leader and as a personal friend.</p>
<p>Here is his introduction by the journal:<br />
President of Pakistan’s Supreme Court Bar Association, Ahsan has been a vocal opponent of President Pervez Musharraf’s rule. When Musharraf dismissed the head of the Supreme Court in March 2007, it was Ahsan who led the legal challenge to reinstate the chief justice and rallied thousands of lawyers who took to the streets in protest. He was arrested several times during the period of emergency rule last year. Today, he is a senior member of the Pakistan Peoples Party, formerly led by Benazir Bhutto, and one of the country’s most recognizable politicians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/25/barrister-aitzaz-ahsan-worlds-5th-public-intellectual/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why all this doom and misery? (Sunday column)</title>
		<link>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/23/why-all-this-doom-and-misery-sunday-column/</link>
		<comments>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/23/why-all-this-doom-and-misery-sunday-column/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitafi.com/?p=433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It so happens that I am totally fed up with De Bono’s six thinking hats. After all, you have to pay dearly if you wear a hat in the scorching heat of summers here. But my problem does not end here. I mean it is quite often that in any corporate office or wherever you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It so happens that I am totally fed up with De Bono’s six thinking hats. After all, you have to pay dearly if you wear a hat in the scorching heat of summers here. But my problem does not end here. I mean it is quite often that in any corporate office or wherever you work you are asked to change your thinking hat for the sake of lateral thinking. These hats or ‘head socks’ as I am obliged to call them are colour coded. White is for facts and figures, red is for intuition, opinion and emotions, yellow for appreciation, black for criticism, green for creativity and blue for the holistic picture. But a hat often ignored by our master of self-help is the one which bosses usually wear – the hat of arrogance. ‘I know better’ is the constant mantra in such situations. Having worked with some of the politest and most principled centred team players I have seen how often a boss has to remove this hat and listen to his subordinates to make things work. But that was one hat missed. There are others. One that we Pakistanis quite often wear on our heads like a permanently stuck wig is the hat of Moaning Myrtle. I am evidently referring to a character from JK Rowling’s magnum opus who having being killed a painful death and turned into a ghost always takes pleasure in wailing out loud and always being in a sombre mood.</p>
<p>There is no gainsaying that the times are tough. I know that the capital is on the flight, that the changes once promised are not coming by quickly, that the country has to sink even deeper to emerge out of this cesspool. And the fact that everyone from the Persians to the Yanks and Afghans many want Pakistan either colonised or fractured is not going to help either. But remember we are good at surviving if survival you can call it. If you take a peek into our history our very survival, very existence, this national life seem nothing short of a big adventure. But if life is an adventure death was an awfully big adventure for Peter Pan. If we do not fear death or national demise what is it that is bothering us?</p>
<p>I know that we are a vulnerable nation. We are fully aware what chance can do to us. It is not very farfetched to think that just anyone can move in a bid to colonise us. Within our frontiers we are bickering and fighting among ourselves and two seriously blood stained operations already seem never ending. Money is getting cheaper and the daily household stuff very expensive. If only I start narrating my own troubles with my own worldview I assure you, you will get a nervous stomach. But despite all this folks, I must remind you that we badly need some patience and empathy. Is it not enough that we all are alive? Alive in this extreme weather. Should we not be thankful that the younger ones among us are keen to make some difference?</p>
<p>Like we need strategies for life we need some graceful ways to accept loss, defeat and if the moment comes death. In this context graceful defiance is perhaps the only way left. I for one hence liked Sarmad Khurram when he refused to accept the prize and walk out on the US Ambassador to Pakistan Anne W. Patterson. I know many would like to see it as a harsh slap in the face. But I do not. This is the most civilised way of registering your displeasure. There is a reason why the dynamics of a walk out are different from a real slap. Some of our friends in order to enhance their stature in the Western eye forget about that. Still others of the overzealous stock misconstrue that such instead of walking out the young chap should have started a boxing match or worse refused to go back to Harvard.</p>
<p>When I make this subtle difference I am certainly referring to the recently held long march by the lawyers. I was in Multan when I saw the crowds coming together. It was not a pretty sight. The marchers were less in number when they left Multan. But as they marched to Islamabad and the number was snowballed another fear gripped me. What will happen if such numbers just paralyse the state’s functioning? Yet I need not have worried. The show was very well organised. When some benighted ones from among the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf (PTI) and the Jamaat-e-Islami (JI) tried to assault the parliament, the veterans from within the lawyers’ movement stepped out to control them. I was much impressed particularly by the conduct of Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan, Justice (retired) Tariq Mehmood and the deposed Chief Justice.</p>
<p>It was clear from that day on that whatever the lawyers want they do not want anarchy. And that the Chief Justice is not keen to get politicised even though the problem of his restoration has become political in nature. Lawyers from the PTI and the JI were later to attack the integrity of Aitzaz Ahsan and Justice Mehmood. It was plain that they were intolerant of any semblance of moderation. The reasons are evident. Both these parties boycotted the elections and since they missed out in an otherwise windfall of representation they want to send the parliament packing so that they can garner further support. The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) is already being subjected to a subtle character assassination and propaganda. Once the parliament is no more and the PML-N refuses to form another Islami Jamhoori Ittehad (IJI) the same machinations will be applied to it too.</p>
<p>If I am saddened it is not because of the troubles this poor nation is facing right now. It is purely because of the utter hypocritical nature of the opportunism of these folks. And above all what really breaks my heart is that liberal men like Imran Khan and Achakzai are also allowing the discredited zealots to use their names to sabotage a system which eventually would bring hope to them too. But despite that I have reasons to be in high spirits and live with optimism. Not all hope is lost. Where is my hat of hope, that you see often with a magician? Wait and see!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/23/why-all-this-doom-and-misery-sunday-column/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistani establishment, the threat and answer to Mr Haq</title>
		<link>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/21/pakistani-establishment-the-threat-and-answer-to-mr-haq/</link>
		<comments>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/21/pakistani-establishment-the-threat-and-answer-to-mr-haq/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitafi.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I usually do not drag the comments of my readers to the new posts. However there was a comment on my previous post If November comes by a fellow blogger which necessitated longer answer. When I wrote it I thought that it should be shared with the general audience too because I have tried to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually do not drag the comments of my readers to the new posts. However there was a comment on my previous post <a title="Permanent link to If November comes (the promised column on the US invasion of Pakistan)" rel="bookmark" href="../2008/06/19/if-november-comes-the-promised-column-on-pakistan-invasion/">I<strong>f November comes</strong></a><strong> </strong>by a fellow blogger which necessitated longer answer. When I wrote it I thought that it should be shared with the general audience too because I have tried to do away with many misconceptions regarding Pak-US relationship, Pakistani establishment and other such contextual problems. Those who need to understand the context should use the above hyperlink to peruse my original post. The original comment of the reader I am reproducing here nevertheless.</p>
<p><a href="http://riazhaq.com" target="_blank">Riaz Haq</a> wrote on June 20, 2008 at 7:30 pm:</p>
<div class="primary content">
<p>Wow!<br />
What a warning!<br />
Please define “establishment” in the context of Pakistan as you use it in this piece. Is it just the military and the “agencies”? Or does it include the narrow elite (including PML, PPP, Feudal zamindars, the bureaucracy, the judiciary, the military, etc.) who have ruled Pakistan since its inception? Do you think any members of this elite have ever been held accountable to the people for their misrule and corruption? Do you think the “establishment” in US is in any way comparable to the Pakistani “establishment”?<br />
If there is “annexation” with Afghanistan (which makes no sense to me), are the beneficiaries going to be any different? How would the US benefit by annexing Pakistan? Or would it just be a merger of the tribals with the feudals to serve the interests of both rather th the US? How would the middle class (the backbone of any democracy) fare under this or any other possible arrangement?</p>
<p><strong>My Response:</strong></p>
<p>Thank you very much Mr Haq,<br />
I don’t know whether this wow from you is a routine jeer from you that I often receive or true appreciation. However from your later statement “which makes no sense to me”, I deduce that it is pretty much routine.<br />
I think in the second line of the article I have given most precise definition of establishment as is possible. Do yourself some good and read the definition again in any of the internet dictionaries or encyclopedia.<br />
Tell me who do you think is conservative in this country and who not? If you consider the People’s Party, perhaps the only progressive political force in the country which does it on its own accord and not out of sycophancy for any dictators, conservative then our conversation is already over. However if you do not then I have problems with your observation regarding the establishment. You certainly are viewing everything with an erroneous elitist model.<br />
Tell me have you heard or read about Milbus? Have you been through Dr Ayesha Siddiqua Agha’s tome Military Inc.? I know what conservatives would say but I really respect that work. If you have you should do so again to know that the civil military and judicial bureaucracy comprise the most powerful element of the Pakistani establishment. But I do not deny that the political elements, the land owning class or the entrepreneurs do not have anything to do with it. They sure do. But since the first element has more control over the state resources that the latter can only work as a vessel in order to preserve selfish interests. How many years in power have politicians actually been successful in setting the agenda of the state, no matter in power or not? Who has ruled this country in most of the years? Who were Ghulam Muhammad, Chaudhry Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Ali Bogra, Ayub Khan, Yahya Khan, Zia-ul-Haq, Ishaq Khan, Moeen Qureshi, Pervez Musharraf and Shaukat Aziz? Do you get my point? Yet I do not discount your views absolutely. My concern is that the People’s Party has never been a conservative force of the country and never part of the establishment.<br />
As for the invasion of annexation of Pakistan I daresay you are not using your imagination. I gather that you have just been offended by my criticism of Musharraf and hence not bothered to see reason in any argument. Sir, I can also say tally ho on most of points you are making in your weird blog which always takes the wrong direction in argument. But I do not. I know that since my views are principle centered rather than whims or personality cult centered people will get what they need from mine.<br />
Pakistan is endowed with quite a few gifts including its geopolitics. From Gwadar to Wakhan corridor and our presence in such an important theater to our rock structure and nuclear prowess, while most of what we have got may not be of use to us but it is to many others. No matter what we say about collective security the world right now is operating on the good old balance of power. While we may not have it in us (evident from your case), there are many who view us a threat. Hence Balkanization or annexation of the country is quite a convincing option. Whether such elements can succeed in doing so or not is besides the point. My only concern is that it can weaken two good countries, which could have played quite benign role, further. If truth be told Pakistan is the most loyal ally of the US after Israel as time has proved time and again. But that doesn’t qualify us for the mercy of the neocons who do not see the world through anything but an insecurity paradigm. You seem to think that the elite other than the establishment would benefit from such an annexation in Pakistan. The problem again is with your judgment. The elite will be replaced with higher and distant elites or suzerains and owing to the zero sum game our political elite is only bound to lose not gain anything.<br />
And let me also settle an old point here. Apparently in another post you wasted your breath in apparently suggesting that the existing US basis in Pakistan are normal while an international inquiry into Benazir’s murder is wrong. I don’t know what kind of self serving and blind notion is that? Either you are stupid or downright hypocrite to suggest that. If there are US bases in Europe that is because in World Wars the US has fought their battles and preserved them from their fellow Europeans from whom many still feel threatened. Whom has the US fought for us? Nobody. It is us that have repeatedly sacrificed ourselves. Again in the Western Europe and the US there is no historical or pronounced mistrust. It is a relevant concern in our case though. The US studies have never indicated that they desire or plan to seize the European nuclear asset in case of any eventuality. There are countless US research/thought papers from prestigious think tanks which recommend that their administration should do just that.<br />
Meanwhile there is no harm in investigating Benazir’s assassination through any international organization. What harm can it do? We all pay lip service to the IGOs like the UN. We all say that collective security is the only way. Then why not seek help of someone who cannot influenced at least by any Pakistani. Kindly think and read again before speaking. Otherwise I am weary of your hollow rants.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/21/pakistani-establishment-the-threat-and-answer-to-mr-haq/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If November comes (the promised column on the US invasion of Pakistan)</title>
		<link>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/19/if-november-comes-the-promised-column-on-pakistan-invasion/</link>
		<comments>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/19/if-november-comes-the-promised-column-on-pakistan-invasion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 18:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Breathing Space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitafi.com/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A war is being fought at the heart of every establishment of the world. Traditionally the establishment is the force of inertia and conservatism in any group or society. Yet the rise of neo-conservatives everywhere during the outgoing decade has taught many a lesson. Osama bin Laden, the US neo-cons and the Fox News phenomenon [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-431" title="neocons1" src="http://pitafi.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/neocons1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="300" /><br />
<span id="myrep__ctl0_lblDtlText">A war is being fought at the heart of every establishment of the world. Traditionally the establishment is the force of inertia and conservatism in any group or society. Yet the rise of neo-conservatives everywhere during the outgoing decade has taught many a lesson. Osama bin Laden, the US neo-cons and the Fox News phenomenon have all shown us to which extent blood-thirst and selfishness can lead some groups to demolish everything precious and humane. I name Osama and Bush’s clique in the same breath because if you see carefully they are two sides of the same coin. All we know is that thanks to al Qaeda and the neo-cons the world has lost trust in the multilateral concepts of collective security. The so-called war on terror was perhaps the crudest attempt at engineering a false clash that would have ruined the human race for generations. The attempt seems to have failed and now the neo-con cabal seems to be passing silently into history. Or is it really?</span></p>
<p>It is true that Dick Cheney, perhaps understanding his unpopularity and bad health, never showed interest in entering into the presidential race. This decision ensured that his neo-con friends would never get a serious chance of regaining power at the centre. But that is not where the real damage has been done. The radicalisation of politics is not a great issue for in a democracy that is always reversible. The actual threat of such deformation is usually to the state institutions which in nature are already quite hostile namely the bureaucracy and the armed forces. I am sure when the American armed forces have produced men like FDR, Colin Powell and Senator McCain there should be some lofty tradition in place yet soldiers the world over usually are taught to be supremacist both in profession and in nationalism. And that is not all. When you have Fox in media and neo-cons in power it is easy to open up to more radicalisation. It is Pavlovian really. When every kind of commendation and promotion for eight years is possible through reiterating the neo-con values it really takes quite a while to undo the damage. Two examples are already in front of us. One of the Indian establishment under the BJP and the Pakistani establishment under Musharraf.</p>
<p>Those who look at the Congress rule in India cannot understand the paradigm shift that has taken place already owing to the BJP rule. Bureaucracy during those days was stuffed with saffron clad bonkers who further radicalised the establishment. How can we forget that in uncountable public gatherings cow’s urine was served instead of water? Even after Congress rose to power the space it has lost to the extremists like Narendra Modi seems impossible to reclaim even though it has to pose radical contestants.</p>
<p>Likewise in Pakistan, the establishment under Musharraf lost all self-esteem and became almost a vessel of the US belligerence. When we pointed that Pakistan should calculate each and every concession made to the Yanks based on the national interest we were reminded that Washington was our paymaster. The slant we had to endure was almost obnoxious. The same retired army officers who are ready to gouge our eyes for advocating some patience towards Musharraf, used to skin us alive whenever we suggested that the army was enduring huge losses owing to its prolonged stay in politics. Unfortunately today when it is proven the same folks are over the top without paying any heed to what we say. The damage done to our establishment during the last military rule may not pose any serious threat to any of our neighbours but it has ensured a permanent risk to democracy in the country. For almost nine years now supporting Musharraf could take you to any coveted post. That ensured that quite a few servicemen inhaled the official propaganda of their chief being the promised Messiah and then regurgitated it whenever they got a chance. Now apparently the state of things have changed a bit and these men have stopped chanting pro-Musharraf slogans but almost a decade of service is quite a long time and the middle tier of the officers corps has to live with the same biases for its entire service life. The facts that the circumstances are daunting and that the democratic government is being pressured not to make fast paced changes are not helping even a bit.</p>
<p>We then cannot be too hopeful about the change in the US establishment. Those endowed with wisdom who have seen the peril without any spin are already fighting the establishments the world over. Again the fact that except for a lunatic fringe no one is averse to Senator Obama’s election to the coveted throne purely on racial basis shows that there might be some hopeful sparks in the air already. Obama’s own talk is also very impressive and promises hope and change. But I am afraid that whosoever is brought to power in November will have to endure almost an instant propaganda that the People’s Party had to face in Pakistan or the Congress in India. While we can tolerate the neo-cons, the BJP and in our case a dictator for almost a decade we are not ready to give the true standard bearers of democracy, moderation and humanity any chance to survive. Senator Obama my prayers are with you but you need to be please just as good as you seem for otherwise the future of the species hangs truly in balance.</p>
<p>As for the neo-cons I have this to say. It is wrong to consider them a group of psychopathic Dr Strangeloves. They are not mental. They are opportunistic and mean. I don’t know whether this contagious political disease of taking things to the very brink for personal gains has spread from India during the BJP rule or has evolved from Enron. Yet I have no problem in believing that all this global reign of terror is not merely for psychological issues alone. They are the prophets of crony capitalism. They want the world to be restructured so that the business on whose board they sit next may not have any problem in rising to the top. Their purpose of entering Iraq, Afghanistan and quite soon it seems Pakistan is not to crush some rising radical cult but to restructure the entire resource rich region. If you view carefully Osama bin Laden is equally an ambassador of the Saudi BinLadin Group as are Bush and company the standard bearers of the crony capitalism. If you can trust my drift it is Pakistan which should fear a likely invasion from the US in the coming days rather than Iran. They have not forgotten that a poor country like Pakistan equipped with the nukes and a professional standing army can really become a mid range power once it succeeds in establishing trade and strategic ties with the Central Asian Republics. This is where Musharraf and Karzai figure in. Musharraf during his rule paid considerable lip service to the idea but always vetoed anything practical that could give Pakistan some alternative breathing space. Karzai’s presence in Kabul has ensured that the Taliban insurgency never dies down and Pak-Afghan border is never peaceful. While I do not see how Pakistan, an almost slavish US ally, could pose any serious threat to the US had it succeeded in establishing strategic ties with the CARS, I am deeply concerned that the US establishment cannot see the most probable fallout of its blind policies in the coming days. The fear now is that the two band brothers across this border are now ready to stage a drama in the coming days which will lead to the annexation of Pakistan even before November. Before November because it will be far easier for the new administration to tolerate another foreign colony because then it becomes a management problem and not imperialistic. If not removed as soon as possible or his powers truly curtailed our man can prove to be another Gorbachev. You have already been warned.<br />
(Courtesy <a href="http://thepost.com.pk/OpinionNews.aspx?dtlid=167751&amp;catid=11">The Post</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/19/if-november-comes-the-promised-column-on-pakistan-invasion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistan under threat of invasion? - Read my column in a day</title>
		<link>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/19/pakistan-under-threat-of-invasion-read-my-column-in-a-day/</link>
		<comments>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/19/pakistan-under-threat-of-invasion-read-my-column-in-a-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitafi.com/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You definitely need to know. Accept it or not Pakistan is the next target of the US invasion. It is already clear from the US assault and the blabbering old fool Karzai. While Karzai and another man nearer to us might soon be thrown out like dead rats, before they go they have to fulfill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You definitely need to know. Accept it or not Pakistan is the next target of the US invasion. It is already clear from the US assault and the blabbering old fool Karzai. While Karzai and another man nearer to us might soon be thrown out like dead rats, before they go they have to fulfill some crucial tasks. For more detail you&#8217;ll have to wait another 24 hours to read my column If November comes. So stay tuned. (<strong>THE COLUMN NOW AVAILABLE: </strong><a href="http://pitafi.com/2008/06/19/if-november-comes-the-promised-column-on-pakistan-invasion/" target="_blank"><strong>CLICK HERE</strong></a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/19/pakistan-under-threat-of-invasion-read-my-column-in-a-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sparks in the long march</title>
		<link>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/18/sparks-in-the-long-march/</link>
		<comments>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/18/sparks-in-the-long-march/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 13:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitafi.com/?p=422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When they started off from Multan it was not a pleasant site. The participants of the Long March were not many in numbers. Scorching heat, fear of a terror attack and uncountable other such factors must have worked to stop as many from participating as was possible. But it was a dismal sight. Where were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-423" src="http://pitafi.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/c560446f-9132-48d8-93de-6c5f06e21200_w220.jpg" alt="" width="220" height="165" />When they started off from Multan it was not a pleasant site. The participants of the Long March were not many in numbers. Scorching heat, fear of a terror attack and uncountable other such factors must have worked to stop as many from participating as was possible. But it was a dismal sight. Where were all those elements of the society who had vowed to stand with lawyers for the restoration of judiciary? No one had any clue.<br />
Seeing off the marching lawyers in Multan I had thought that just like the previous travels of the supporters of the deposed Chief Justice this caravan would take quite a while to reach Islamabad. But that was only an incorrect perception. Before long the marchers were meeting in front of the parliament and the Supreme Court. And unlike Multan they were in great numbers. Now an old fear was returning to me. Could it be the end of times for Pakistan? Could these people paralyze the entire system? Could this be the start of the civil war? The mood in the air at least indicated that it was. As people started chanting slogan I could smell the bloodthirst.<span id="more-422"></span><br />
But that was that. Apart from the speech of Nawaz Sharif who is again losing sight of the moderation and those silly and young PTI workers that tried to run on the presidency and the parliament there was nothing to worry. The lawyers certainly knew how to regulate themselves. When the PTI boys tried to cross the barbed wires to reach the parliament it was the lawyers who dragged them back. There was no sit in. Just a huge gathering and show of power. It was great to know that the lawyers were not falling for the eerie world view of Imran Khan and Qazi Hussain Ahmed. They were not staging a sit in. Both these gents want the parliament to be sent packing. They hope that once the system is rubbished and new elections take place the agencies will help in the re-establishment of the IJI (Islami Jamhoori Ittihad - the agency sponsored alliance of the conservatives) and hence pave their way to the parliament. That is exactly why the Jamaat-e-Islami and the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaaf workers are joining in the Muslim League propaganda against the Pakistan People&#8217;s Party and its Co-Chairman Asif Ali Zardari.<br />
With friends like these who needs an enemy. Take Mr Nawaz Sharif for instance. He has forgotten that it was Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto who had advocated for his return to the country as well. It was she who had convinced him not boycott the elections when he was on the verge of committing political suicide with the counsel of Qazi and co. He has even forgotten that it was the same Zardari who convinced him not to boycott the elections after the assassination of Miss Bhutto. The very same man who refused to deny him the rightful rule in Punjab by rebuffing the Q-league&#8217;s offer of help in government formation. If Zardari is taking time in bringing the promised changes it is because he is enduring terrible pressures from the local and foreign establishments. Also the party has had quite an experience of persecution at the hands of the judiciary and hence wants to tread very carefully.<br />
But here is the warning shot. The People&#8217;s Party leadership needs to wake up to the realities of life. It is a victim of double jeopardy. Its friends and foes particularly from Punjab and upper Sindh are united to finish it off. They think that in the absence of Mohtarma Bhutto People&#8217;s Party can easily be belittled and reduced to nothingness. It is the party&#8217;s responsibility to fight such demons and survive. If anything the long march has already shown that the people want change in the presidency and that the issue of the restoration of judiciary cannot be hushed up. Aitzaz Ahsen, Justice (retired) Tariq and the deposed Chief Justice have already shown that they are far more responsible than the government&#8217;s unelected advisers. The way Barrister Ahsen and others managed the culmination of the long march remains salutary. Likewise the fact that the Chief Justice did not show up in the final even reminds us that he still is trying to remain apolitical. These men and others like them need to be trusted and honored.<br />
There is a principle of politics that none of us can ignore. Democracy is the politics of the people. The People&#8217;s Party has quite effectually shown everyone that it wants restoration of judiciary without any big conflict. But it should know that its loyalty essentially lies with the popular sentiments. Any misjudgment of the popular issues can lead just anyone to the oblivion. If the party fails to take stock of the situation correctly it may fail to benefit from the wave of public trust for the politicians. If anything it needs to realize that the people really want the judges&#8217; issue to be resolved at once so that some attention can be given to other matters. I am not saying that the government should lose it composure and assail whatever stability remains in the country. However it should remember that those who are advising it to keep delaying the matter for quite sometime are actually working against it. It has to be resolved at once or else the party suffers from great image particularly in Punjab. Meanwhile the propaganda mill is in spin already. Anyone in Punjab who has voted for any party other than the PPP now tries to allege the party leadership for the assassination of Ms Bhutto.  This is ridiculous. The party needs to rush to silence such folks through scoring some important brownie points through action and not mere words. The restoration of judges through a fast paced constitutional package and replacement of those unelected advisers who have actually causing unpopularity of the party (most important of these folks if Mr Rahman Malik) would do the party quite good. Otherwise it will remain in a state of suspended animation and lose track of things and perhaps its own popularity. As someone who is sentimental about the future of the party and the preservation of the moderate class in the country this is a heart felt appeal. Change should be visible to the people so that the popular appeal of those who are playing on the sentiments of people can be done away with. We can be fickle minded but we are not so fickle minded. We should remember that while Nawaz Sharif&#8217;s current position is brave and a bit impressive it was he who had attacked the Supreme Court and the freedom of press during his rule. The party needs to snatch from him the leadership of the pro-judiciary movement and regain the lost ground. An alliance with him however needs to be continued because the options are even worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/18/sparks-in-the-long-march/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pressuring Geo Network again? - Don&#8217;t even think about it</title>
		<link>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/13/pressuring-geo-network-again-dont-even-think-about-it/</link>
		<comments>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/13/pressuring-geo-network-again-dont-even-think-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitafi.com/?p=418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The presidency just seems to have had another attack of madness. We are told that the administration in Dubai has asked the Geo Network to either shut its transmission or then to close down two of its best selling programs Capital Talk and Merey Mutabiq again. Since the presenter of the latter program Dr Shahid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-419" title="geo" src="http://pitafi.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/geo.gif" alt="" width="202" height="75" />The presidency just seems to have had another attack of madness. We are told that the administration in Dubai has asked the Geo Network to either shut its transmission or then to close down two of its best selling programs Capital Talk and Merey Mutabiq again. Since the presenter of the latter program Dr Shahid Masood has already been nominated for the Chairmanship of the state owned Pakistan Television by the democratic government it is clear that it does not have a hand in it. It is the presidency which now has the problem with the PTV as well for not showing enough of Mervez Pusharraf. It is plain then that an embattled president is now showing his colors again. <span id="more-418"></span>As far as the PTV is concerned I clearly remember that when the Geo News was last closed last time from Dubai and removed from cable in Pakistan, since the state television was under Musharraf&#8217;s control it showed nothing but naked propaganda. No democratic representative was shown and the private channels were subjected to ridicule. If Musharraf can do it to his opponents why should the democratic government not do it to him as he still is conspiring against the people&#8217;s representatives? Pakistan Television, since now it is following a fairly balanced approach, should desist from becoming a mouthpiece of a dictator. Well done PTV, well done Geo.<br />
Since Geo Television is a private channel it has every right to decide its own policy. Some claim that airing Jamshed Gulzar Kayani&#8217;s interview was a grave mistake. Such claims are simply rubbish. As a moral leader it is Geo&#8217;s prerogative to decide whom to air and it did right to air him. But had it not done so some other channel would have done it. And even if the national channels would have refused someone who has to speak would speak at every cost. Do you know what does it mean? It means that the man would have gone to the channels which take every chance to insult Pakistani nationhood. For instance an Indian channel. And the treatment of the so-called revelations by such a channel would have been absolutely different.<br />
Geo has done well to contain the damage. It gave full chance to the presidency to counter the arguments forwarded by Jamshed Gulzar. If this you call an unbiased approach then you sure have different standards. Geo has even offered to give president space to address the people in the name of the freedom of speech. If the president does not want to do that it is his own insecurity and not Geo&#8217;s.<br />
The Dubai dictatorship needs to stop and think again also. While it has the democratic deficit it had embraced capitalism with open arm and that is why it was allowed to flourish economically. Now if it repeats that old mistake of shackling the investors&#8217; freedom of action it will never be forgiven and will quickly lose investment.<br />
The presidency needs to show some sanity. Such an arbitrary course of action will only sow the seeds for further disgrace to the president once he is removed. If Musharraf doesn&#8217;t know it already he should understand that right now he is standing in the shoes of Saddam Hussein. Any more stupidity and he will leave any excuse for those who like me believe in advocating a safe exit for him. Propagating that Geo is involved in a foreign conspiracy will not save his skin now. We all know if there is any foreign conspirator it is him.<br />
It is time for the media outlets of the country to stand united. First they should remember that this can happen to them too. Second those among us who are operating from Dubai should think of moving to any of the institutionalized democracy. You cannot expect benign response from dictatorships, monarchies and oligarchies. Dubai has lost its stability as an investment hub. We now need to move on. Also all the channels need to seek the help of the democratic government and quickly launch a Direct to Home (DTH) service. This needs to be done immediately for the sake of the customer satisfaction and even in view of the problems posed by the power outages to the cable operations. In solidarity, Long live Freedom of Speech, Long Live Geo TV. Hamid Mir and Dr Shahid Masood we all are with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/13/pressuring-geo-network-again-dont-even-think-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The judges&#8217; issue and the PML-N&#8217;s double standards</title>
		<link>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/13/the-judges-issue-and-the-pml-ns-double-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/13/the-judges-issue-and-the-pml-ns-double-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitafi.com/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I keep wondering about the PML-N&#8217;s double standards. While on one side it is trying to play up the issue of the judiciary&#8217;s restoration for the populist gains it is also true that it is practically doing nothing in Punjab to do the same. For instance the policy that we all are acquainted with is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep wondering about the PML-N&#8217;s double standards. While on one side it is trying to play up the issue of the judiciary&#8217;s restoration for the populist gains it is also true that it is practically doing nothing in Punjab to do the same. For instance the policy that we all are acquainted with is that the November 2, 2007 measures taken by the president were arbitrary and unconstitutional, hence the parliament or the Chief Executive needs to pass an executive order, a hukam nama, to restore the judges. In short all the Prime Minister has to do is to issue an order to the police to go, remove the PCO judges from the courts and bring back the pre-Nov 2 judges. At least this seems to be the PML-N&#8217;s main argument. <span id="more-417"></span>Why do you need a constitutional amendment to bring back the judges if the then Army Chief&#8217;s change never became part of the constitution.<br />
If that is true and makes any sense then the PML-N has power in one federating unit namely Punjab. The President of the PML-N is the Chief Executive of the Punjab Province. In Lahore no official decision can be made without the stated will of Shahbaz Sharif. If that is the case and Shahbaz Sharif really has power in the province, it should have issued an executive order to restore the Lahore High Court judges at the very least. No, the matter is not federal prerogative if it is not constitutional. If the November 2 emergency measures were not constitutional PML-N government needs just to order the police and restore the LHC judges to their benches. Will that happen? I think not. Why? Because I think that the PML-N&#8217;s stand is fallacious. Even if the act of November 2 was unconstitutional, the proof of which is that the emergency was imposed by the army chief, there always are such things as unwritten conventions. Even if dictators take arbitrary steps those who believe in the supremacy of institutions need to approach the matter through institutionalized procedures. If a Prime Minister is given the right to sack the sitting Chief Justice and rubbish institutional changes that precede his rule, a pandora box will open without leaving us anywhere. Those who remember Mr Nawaz Sharif&#8217;s last rule will understand my point readily. Hence while it is time taking and arduous the PPP&#8217;s stand is quite correct and if instead of showing restlessness the lawyers, civil society and the media had shown some trust in the PPP government and would have reinforced its stand rather than pressuring it the matter would have already been resolved. Even now the lawyers marching on Islamabad need to reflect on this and instead of exerting undue pressure on the parliament they should pressure the Presidency. Meanwhile what the PML-N fails to do something for the LHC&#8217;s judges its double standards should not escape our attention. Let it be a test for the PML-N government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/13/the-judges-issue-and-the-pml-ns-double-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Airstrike on Pakistan and its meaning</title>
		<link>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/13/us-airstrike-on-pakistan-and-its-meaning/</link>
		<comments>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/13/us-airstrike-on-pakistan-and-its-meaning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 21:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Farrukh</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pitafi.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have read the last two books of the Harry Potter series, you&#8217;ll be acquainted fairly with the paradigmal difference between cruelty and humanism. Take Lord Voldemort for instance. He wanted to keep everyone under the thumb and be immortal. The only way he found to be immortal was to make horcruxes, curious devices [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-416" title="samdemort" src="http://pitafi.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/samdemort.jpg" alt="" width="275" height="384" />If you have read the last two books of the Harry Potter series, you&#8217;ll be acquainted fairly with the paradigmal difference between cruelty and humanism. Take Lord Voldemort for instance. He wanted to keep everyone under the thumb and be immortal. The only way he found to be immortal was to make horcruxes, curious devices which store a small portion of your soul.And in order to rip apart that part of your soul you have to kill someone for it is the only known way to split your soul into two in the Potter world. While Voldemort that by killing quite a few people and making several horcruxes he is getting stronger and stronger the fact remains he is only getting by each evil act weaker still for his soul is left badly scarred, unstable and truncated.<span id="more-415"></span><br />
Frankly I don&#8217;t know whether anything apart from consciousness exists worth calling a soul or not, yet the lore of the horcruxes is a majestic literary device to show how the inner dynamics work despite absence of any external damage. Heroes whose enemies respect them are impossible to find in this mundane world yet in most cases we are lucky that our friends respect us. When like Voldemort all your socalled friends fear you instead of respecting you should know that you are not afterall a victor. Such folks are usually defied at the end.<br />
But the problem here is of not Voldemort but Harry becoming evil and cruel. The reason why the US is powerful today is that the values it has long advocated like liberty, democracy and humanity are quite popular. Otherwise did the USSR not have more warheads than the US? If the US was seen during the cold war as a beacon of hope by many it was because its value system was more appealing to the world. When such a moral leader starts assailing its own allies, allies that have sacrificed quite a lot for it, you should know that the end is nigh.<br />
Now take stock today. What has the US become? How can it be the champion of human rights when its human rights record at Gitmo and Abu Ghraib is a cause for shame? How can countries seek strength from your friendship when they fear that one day you&#8217;ll invade them? If the US wants to know whether it is getting strong or weak it should see it in the eyes of the families of those who it has killed thus far. Granted that on September 11, 2001 it had suffered a grotesque assault. It had lost about 3000 precious lives. That incident was a shameful chapter in the history of mankind. But it does not justify the deaths of the innocent people killed or being killed in the weakest countries by the US and its allies. Terrorists are threat to all but the US government needs to do more to show that these terrorists are not its allies planted to give it an excuse to invade poor countries and kill the innocent.<br />
In fact I consider the neo-cons and their prince GW Bush the most wretched and unluckiest people in the world for spoiling something which could be so benign. Yes I am talking about the US. If the US not invaded not weak countries or killed innocent in its imperial hubris it would have been a savior of mankind. But that chance is wasted. Alas today Harry Potter has become another master of the horcruxes.<br />
You know what, the recent assault on the Pakistani forces by the US, took place when the Long March against Musharraf was finally launched. For long Musharraf has threatened his generals that if he is sacked the US would invade Pakistan. So finally he and his foreign masters have decided to remind the Pakistani forces just that. We know that after Musharraf lost his clout in the army the American Pakistan policy has become rudderless. Miss Bhutto was assassinated because the US didn&#8217;t want Musharraf to be replaced by any democratic leader in the eyes of the pro-democracy westerners. Even now he is kept as a possible Gorbachev. I believe that the US neo-cons either want the status quo in Pakistan to prevail till the US presidential elections or else they want to see Pakistan balkanizing before that in revenge.  If the latter is true the airstrikes like the recent one will multiply and the presidency will try to replace the Army Chief and hence dividing the army. In such a scenario a Yeltsin will apparently save the day while starting the dismemberment of Pakistan. Pakistan Army then needs to ensure its integrity and desist from becoming Musharraf&#8217;s victim. And while it is possible to break Pakistan for it is a small fry like Severus Snape in Harry Potter world, it is the US which is the ultimate loser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://pitafi.com/2008/06/13/us-airstrike-on-pakistan-and-its-meaning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
