Comments on: Pakistani establishment, the threat and answer to Mr Haq http://pitafi.com/2008/06/21/pakistani-establishment-the-threat-and-answer-to-mr-haq/ Weblog featuring high-quality editorial commentary, research and analysis Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:26:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Riaz Haq http://pitafi.com/2008/06/21/pakistani-establishment-the-threat-and-answer-to-mr-haq/comment-page-1/#comment-639 Riaz Haq Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:51:59 +0000 http://pitafi.com/?p=432#comment-639 There is none so blind as those who will not see. I rest my case. There is none so blind as those who will not see.
I rest my case.

]]> By: Farrukh http://pitafi.com/2008/06/21/pakistani-establishment-the-threat-and-answer-to-mr-haq/comment-page-1/#comment-633 Farrukh Sat, 21 Jun 2008 00:43:24 +0000 http://pitafi.com/?p=432#comment-633 Aha, so you who often use harsh words for me on my own website now worry about courtesies. That's a good one. I think you are trying to imply that Zulfi Bhutto was the part of the establishment that is why this elected prime minister was hanged by the very set up. That is perhaps why his two sons were butchered. His wife forced to lose her marbles. And guess where his daughter was killed? Rawalpindi! That essentially must be a special tribute by the establishment to Bhutto for his contributions. I mean can you simply not see? Regarding the People's Party being not progressive, excuse me but what is you complaint. You have issues with the way the party chooses its leader? Well maybe I ask who has been advocating authoritarian rule rather than democracy in this country for months now? I daresay you. Who has been busy in mudslinging on the political class? You sir. Now you have problems with democracy in the party? Come off it now. Zulfi Bhutto made passport the right of a common citizen when earlier it was prerogative of the elite. His daughter introduced adult franchise in the tribal areas where only the tribal elders could vote. Every foreign policy paradigm by Miss Bhutto has been adopted grudgingly by the establishment of the country not because she was part of it but because she was right in her policy direction. THis is why I call her party progressive. And as for this video I mean have you watched it yourself? Both Steve and Shuja Nawaz were excellent. If anyone kept barking mad it was that bony and skeletal puppet of the establishment Shahid Husain who could not even control his breath and was visibly suffering from social anxiety. I mean if a shameless man can keep on blabbering about a great leader just killed you can assess his mental stature. And before you challenge my terms which you, owing to your own lack of diction, call labels, you should open some good dictionary and read it cover to cover. Sorry I am not this rash usually but how can you complain when you keep doing it quite often on my very on site. Aha, so you who often use harsh words for me on my own website now worry about courtesies. That’s a good one.
I think you are trying to imply that Zulfi Bhutto was the part of the establishment that is why this elected prime minister was hanged by the very set up. That is perhaps why his two sons were butchered. His wife forced to lose her marbles. And guess where his daughter was killed? Rawalpindi! That essentially must be a special tribute by the establishment to Bhutto for his contributions. I mean can you simply not see?
Regarding the People’s Party being not progressive, excuse me but what is you complaint. You have issues with the way the party chooses its leader? Well maybe I ask who has been advocating authoritarian rule rather than democracy in this country for months now? I daresay you. Who has been busy in mudslinging on the political class? You sir. Now you have problems with democracy in the party? Come off it now.
Zulfi Bhutto made passport the right of a common citizen when earlier it was prerogative of the elite. His daughter introduced adult franchise in the tribal areas where only the tribal elders could vote. Every foreign policy paradigm by Miss Bhutto has been adopted grudgingly by the establishment of the country not because she was part of it but because she was right in her policy direction. THis is why I call her party progressive.
And as for this video I mean have you watched it yourself? Both Steve and Shuja Nawaz were excellent. If anyone kept barking mad it was that bony and skeletal puppet of the establishment Shahid Husain who could not even control his breath and was visibly suffering from social anxiety. I mean if a shameless man can keep on blabbering about a great leader just killed you can assess his mental stature.
And before you challenge my terms which you, owing to your own lack of diction, call labels, you should open some good dictionary and read it cover to cover. Sorry I am not this rash usually but how can you complain when you keep doing it quite often on my very on site.

]]> By: Riaz Haq http://pitafi.com/2008/06/21/pakistani-establishment-the-threat-and-answer-to-mr-haq/comment-page-1/#comment-632 Riaz Haq Fri, 20 Jun 2008 23:45:21 +0000 http://pitafi.com/?p=432#comment-632 I am mystified as to how the PPP , the party of the biggest feudal lords in Pakistan can qualify as "progressive". It's a party where there has just been a "monarchical" succession that emanates from a sense of entitlement. I think your labels are very misleading and lead you to reach the wrong conclusions. Please take a look at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8nnYo_Ieuo Thank you for you "kindness" in your response. Unfortunately, I hear a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing. You really haven't answered the questions I posed. Please go behind the convenient labels. Please address the real substance calmly, instead of trying to abuse me personally. I am mystified as to how the PPP , the party of the biggest feudal lords in Pakistan can qualify as “progressive”. It’s a party where there has just been a “monarchical” succession that emanates from a sense of entitlement. I think your labels are very misleading and lead you to reach the wrong conclusions.

Please take a look at this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e8nnYo_Ieuo

Thank you for you “kindness” in your response. Unfortunately, I hear a lot of sound and fury signifying nothing. You really haven’t answered the questions I posed. Please go behind the convenient labels. Please address the real substance calmly, instead of trying to abuse me personally.

]]>